← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Apollo Micro SystemsNSE:APOLLO

Defence · ₹13,768 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Makes electronics for nearly every Indian missile and naval weapon, now adding explosives. A booming order book lifted sales 61% and doubled profit, but cash burn is heavy and the stock trades near 120x earnings.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +80.9%+16.3%+44.8%+34.8%
Operating profit▲ +88.9%+36.0%+53.4%+41.1%
EPS▲ +128.3%+45.8%+52.0%+45.2%
PAT▲ +164.3%+60.9%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +80.9%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average56/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 52% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹408 → ₹817 needs the P/E at 72× — it is 126× today, and has ranged 17× to 159× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.9 +90% — profit growing 52% a year, and buyers paying 68× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

17×5-year low 65×usual level 72×to double 107×to triple 126×today 159×5-year high

Tripling needs 107× — it has traded there — high was 159×.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?P/E 126× is 1.85× its own 5-year average of 68× — far above it; forward PEG 1.59 — dear for its growth 2/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.27 a year (×2.06 over 3 years) — re-rate underway — late 2/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 9% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 11.1×P/B — ₹37 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 83×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.93earnings ×1.52, price-tag ×1.27
At what price this changes
Average from ₹396 to ₹1,632 · now ₹408
below ₹392 → Weak

At ₹221 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 68× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mid-cap at ₹13,768 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 52.0% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Defence · 6 of 33 listed

It earns 14% on its capital, fifth of 6, and it is the most expensive of those shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Apollo Micro Sys ₹376 115.3× ₹13,976 Cr 14.5% +45.4% +88.1%
Hind.Aeronautics ₹4,862 34.8× ₹3.25 L Cr 32.0% +14.9% +14.4%
Bharat Electron ₹398 47.4× ₹2.91 L Cr 36.4% +8.7% +24.9%
Bharat Dynamics ₹1,175 82.7× ₹43,071 Cr 13.9% +547.4% +130.8%
Garden Reach Sh. ₹2,387 34.2× ₹27,342 Cr 42.8% +43.8% +38.5%
Data Pattern ₹4,533 93.9× ₹25,377 Cr 21.9% −13.5% +16.8%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 22% → 21% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? very little of it arrived as cash -50% last year, -41% over three · free cash flow −₹357 cr, positive in 1 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹543 cr — 0.41× its own equity (was 0.55×)
Is it being collected? customers are taking longer to pay 194 days to collect, up 39 in a year · cash cycle 443 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 50.0% (−0.7 in a year), 52.7% → 50.0% over 2.8 years · FIIs 7.6% (+0.4) · DIIs 1.7% (+0.1) · shareholders 85,206 → 3,98,043
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 14.5% · ROE 11.8%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 61.6% CAGR over last 5 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 10.4 times its book value
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last quarter: -2.00%
  • Company has a low return on equity of 10.2% over last 3 years.
  • Promoters have pledged 30.5% of their holding.
  • Company has high debtors of 194 days.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.