← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

GE Vernova T&D India LtdNSE:GVT&D

Power · ₹1.09 L Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Grid-equipment maker in India's massive power build-out; orders booked equal ~3 years of sales and profit margins tripled. Management reliably under-promises and over-delivers. Strongest pick here.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +42.0%−3.8%+30.8%+12.4%
Operating profit▲ +76.6%−2.2%+129.6%+48.5%
EPS▲ +88.7%+20.9%+490.0%+82.8%
PAT▲ +89.3%+21.0%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +42.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average50/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 60% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹4,203 → ₹8,406 needs the P/E at 43× — it is 87× today, and has ranged 59× to 676× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×2.8 +182% — profit growing 60% a year, and buyers paying 60× for it

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

43×to double 59×5-year low 64×to triple 87×today 99×usual level 676×5-year high

Tripling needs 64× — inside its 5-year range, under the 99× median.

Target capped at 60× — its 103× five-year average came from near-zero earnings.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ base effect⚠ EPS not sales-backed⚠ size is the headwind
Is it cheap right now?P/E 87× is 0.85× its own 5-year average of 103× — below it; forward PEG 0.91 — fair for its growth 13/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.33 a year (×2.33 over 3 years) — re-rate underway — late 2/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?margin/one-off driven; growth rate not repeatable 12/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 46% on its own book — high 10/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 40.0×P/B — ₹105 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 55×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×2.12earnings ×1.60, price-tag ×1.33
At what price this changes
Average from ₹4,119 to ₹5,925 · now ₹4,203
above ₹5,967 → Weak  ·  below ₹4,077 → Weak

At ₹2,890 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 60× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth rate is a one-off base reset — the score can't be trusted. Check next quarter.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mega-cap at ₹1,09,458 cr — size is the headwind here: a triple means the market finding ₹2,18,916 cr of new value.

Why the target is capped at 60×. This company averaged 103× over five years, but a multiple that high comes from near-zero earnings rather than from what buyers chose to pay — projecting a return to it would price in the collapse, not the recovery. 60× is what a 60% grower supports.

Growth rate used: 60.0% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR, capped at 60%. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Power · 6 of 46 listed

It earns 77% on its capital, more than any of them — the next best earns 30%, and it is the fifth most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
GE Vernova T&D ₹4,365 82.7× ₹1.12 L Cr 77.4% +24.6% +38.0%
A B B ₹7,177 98.7× ₹1.52 L Cr 29.9% +8.0% +21.0%
B H E L ₹431 61.8× ₹1.50 L Cr 9.1% +182.7% +40.3%
CG Power & Ind ₹907 112.4× ₹1.43 L Cr 26.7% +16.3% +14.0%
Hitachi Energy ₹31,983 119.7× ₹1.43 L Cr 29.4% +123.5% +68.6%
Siemens ₹3,801 90.0× ₹1.35 L Cr 21.4% −18.6% +14.8%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? wider, but it has moved around a lot operating margin 7% → 25% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 129% last year, 141% over three · free cash flow ₹1,521 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹24 cr — 0.01× its own equity (was 0.02×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 128 days to collect, up 3 in a year · cash cycle 90 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 51.0%, 75.0% → 51.0% over 2.8 years · FIIs 22.9% (+8.4) · DIIs 18.5% (−8.3) · shareholders 39,717 → 1,38,122
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 77.4% · ROE 57.4%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 85.6% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 42.3%
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 23.4%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 41.8 times its book value
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last 3 years: -24.0%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.