← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Huhtamaki IndiaNSE:HUHTAMAKI

Packaging · ₹1,837 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

Prints and laminates the pouches and wrappers for big FMCG brands. A new MD arrived January 2026 to cut unused product lines and lift margins, which have already doubled from 5% to ~8-10%, with ₹480 cr net cash at 1.8x book. Revenue has been flat seven years and volumes kept falling until last quarter, when they finally grew. But management refuses to guide on whether that continues, and returns are still only 12%.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +22.6%+22.4%−6.1%+0.1%
Operating profit▲ +74.4%+87.5%+9.2%−1.3%
EPS▲ +75.5%+70.8%+33.5%+4.3%
PAT▲ +76.0%+69.2%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +22.6%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Good67/100

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 34% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹234 → ₹468 needs the P/E at 11× — it is 13× today. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×4.7 +374% — profit growing 34% a year, and buyers paying 26× for it again
To triple, the P/E must be16× comfortably inside its own history
Pays today · its average13× / 26× its own 5-year average
The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet
Is it cheap right now?P/E 13× is 0.50× its own 5-year average of 26× — deeply below it; forward PEG 0.29 — very cheap for its growth 24/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.73 a year (×0.40 over 3 years) — mostly unpaid 13/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?sales not growing; QoQ holding 15/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 10% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 1.3×P/B — ₹179 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 9.7×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×0.98earnings ×1.34, price-tag ×0.73
At what price this changes
Good from ₹224 to ₹404 · now ₹234
above ₹406 → Average  ·  below ₹222 → Average

At ₹466 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 26× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth still unpaid, one leg weaker. Worth the concall read.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. There is no 5-year range on file for this company, so the comparison falls back to its average alone. This is a small-cap at ₹1,837 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 33.5% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Packaging · 6 of 51 listed

It earns 12% on its capital, fourth of 6, and it is the fourth most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Huhtamaki India ₹243 13.5× ₹1,836 Cr 12.0% +76.8% +22.5%
EPL Ltd ₹240 18.8× ₹7,697 Cr 17.8% −1.4% +25.3%
AGI Greenpac ₹735 12.9× ₹4,755 Cr 19.5% +12.1% +14.2%
Uflex ₹654 6.8× ₹4,724 Cr 7.0% +629.6% +37.6%
TCPL Packaging ₹3,859 29.1× ₹3,511 Cr 17.9% +65.5% +15.8%
Polyplex Corpn ₹1,080 21.8× ₹3,391 Cr 0.9% +571.4% +29.6%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 3 years earlier operating margin 6% → 10% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 120% last year, 130% over three · free cash flow ₹184 cr, positive in 4 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹145 cr — 0.11× its own equity (was 0.11×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 82 days to collect, down 1 in a year · cash cycle 26 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 67.7%, 67.7% → 67.7% over 2.8 years · FIIs 0.7% (−0.4) · DIIs 1.0% (+0.4) · shareholders 26,830 → 35,339
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 12.0% · ROE 9.0%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

Against it

  • The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 0.05% over past five years.
  • Company has a low return on equity of 8.79% over last 3 years.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.