← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Mahindra LogisticsNSE:MAHLOG

Logistics · ₹3,852 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

New CEO turned chronic losses around by clearing debt, cutting idle warehouse space and dropping loss-making contracts. Those fixes are one-time and nearly finished, so growth must now come from volume and pricing; the Express arm still loses money with no deadline, and it leans heavily on the Mahindra group.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +23.3%+11.8%+10.9%+16.5%
Operating profit▲ +51.3%+2.7%+11.8%+21.0%
EPS▲ +334.9%+26.1%−55.7%−40.4%
PAT▲ +411.1%+27.3%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +23.3%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Poor30/100

Earnings are shrinking, not growing. Profit per share fell 56% a year over the window measured. Nothing compounds from here until that turns, whatever the price does.

No forward view — earnings are not compounding, so there is nothing to project.

The Hope Tradebuyers paying more for earnings that are not growing⚠ inflection⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?earnings are not growing — a low multiple here is not a discount 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×2.34 a year (×12.74 over 3 years) — already re-rated 0/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fell year-on-year; QoQ holding 10/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns only 3% on its own book 0/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 3.6×P/B — ₹118 of book value per share
Price over the last year ×1.03earnings ×0.44, price-tag ×2.34

Multiple moved without the earnings — the return sits in sentiment.

How this is calculated

Band capped: earnings are not growing over the measured window.

Growth rate used: -55.7% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Logistics · 6 of 48 listed

It earns 7% on its capital, fifth of 6, and it is the second most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Mahindra Logis. ₹394 99.2× ₹3,912 Cr 7.4% +335.1% +23.3%
Container Corpn. ₹496 30.4× ₹37,780 Cr 12.6% +0.1% +0.3%
Delhivery ₹428 268.8× ₹32,074 Cr 1.0% −65.0% +27.8%
Shadowfax Technologies ₹249 84.7× ₹14,593 Cr 10.3% +624.3% +66.3%
Blue Dart Expres ₹4,833 35.4× ₹11,470 Cr 15.8% +81.2% +15.0%
Transport Corp. ₹826 13.9× ₹6,350 Cr 19.4% −0.8% +9.6%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 5% → 6% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 93% last year, 103% over three · free cash flow ₹118 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? borrowed about as much as it owns ₹650 cr — 0.55× its own equity (was 1.98×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 36 days to collect, down 1 in a year · cash cycle 36 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have been buying promoters 59.6% (+1.6 in a year), 58.0% → 59.6% over 2.8 years · FIIs 4.1% (−0.7) · DIIs 14.4% (+0.6) · shareholders 73,682 → 75,213
What does it earn on its capital? earns little on its capital ROCE 7.4% · ROE 0.3%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 333%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 3.29 times its book value
  • Company has a low return on equity of -5.25% over last 3 years.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.