← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Minda CorporationNSE:MINDACORP

Auto · ₹16,010 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Spark Minda makes auto parts - wiring, locks, clusters. FY26 sales rose 22% and profit 40% on premium electronics and a Rs 10,000 crore order book, but the stock is pricey near 69 times earnings.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +29.0%+9.2%+12.9%+21.2%
Operating profit▲ +32.7%+10.3%+15.4%+28.3%
EPS▲ +139.0%+45.5%+8.2%+46.8%
PAT▲ +138.5%+47.6%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +29.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average59/100

Growing, but too slowly to re-price. Profit per share grew 8% a year. A big re-pricing usually needs more than 15% a year, so the score is capped no matter how cheap it looks.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has reached before

₹673 → ₹1,346 needs the P/E at 71× — it is 45× today, and has ranged 22× to 80× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.1 +9% — profit growing 8% a year, and buyers paying 39× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

22×5-year low 39×usual level 45×today 71×to double 80×5-year high 106×to triple

Tripling needs 106× — never traded above 80× in 5 years.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ inflection⚠ low growth
Is it cheap right now?P/E 45× is 1.16× its own 5-year average of 39× — about level with it; forward PEG 5.04 — expensive for its growth 5/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.17 a year (×1.61 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 14% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 6.1×P/B — ₹110 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 41×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.27earnings ×1.08, price-tag ×1.17

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mid-cap at ₹16,010 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Band capped: growth of 8.2% is below the 15% bar a re-rate needs.

Growth rate used: 8.2% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Auto · 6 of 129 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Minda Corp ₹687 40.8× ₹16,430 Cr 12.7% +64.7% +33.2%
Samvardh. Mothe. ₹164 38.0× ₹1.74 L Cr 13.4% +81.5% +16.6%
Bosch ₹47,778 59.6× ₹1.41 L Cr 21.5% +5.2% +22.0%
Bharat Forge ₹1,992 94.3× ₹95,228 Cr 12.6% −57.7% +18.7%
Uno Minda ₹1,241 58.6× ₹71,675 Cr 19.6% +1.8% +23.8%
Schaeffler India ₹4,147 50.2× ₹64,822 Cr 27.9% +13.7% +17.5%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 11% → 11% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it arrived as cash 110% last year, 99% over three · free cash flow ₹311 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? borrowed about as much as it owns ₹1,476 cr — 0.56× its own equity (was 0.73×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 59 days to collect, down 1 in a year · cash cycle 18 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 64.8%, 64.8% → 64.8% over 2.8 years · FIIs 9.3% (+0.5) · DIIs 17.9% (−0.3) · shareholders 96,387 → 98,747
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 12.7% · ROE 14.7%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 6.26 times its book value
  • Company has a low return on equity of 13.3% over last 3 years.
  • Dividend payout has been low at 12.4% of profits over last 3 years

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.