← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Park Medi World LtdNSE:PARKHOSPS

Healthcare · ₹11,934 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Buys and builds hospitals at half the usual cost, then fills the beds. Profit up 27%, now debt-free, and future expansion is fully self-funded. A third of beds still empty means room to grow.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +29.9%+12.2%+10.2%+17.0%
Operating profit▲ +44.3%+28.3%+5.6%+8.9%
EPS▲ +40.2%+40.2%−25.2%−40.5%
PAT▲ +48.1%+45.3%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +29.9%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Poor30/100

⚠ Your own view here is Positive, and the figures are not. The note above is where the reason lives; the score only sees the numbers.

Earnings are shrinking, not growing. Profit per share fell 25% a year over the window measured. Nothing compounds from here until that turns, whatever the price does.

No forward view — earnings are not compounding, so there is nothing to project.

The Hope Tradebuyers paying more for earnings that are not growing⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?earnings are not growing — a low multiple here is not a discount 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.57 a year (×1.57 over the year) — re-rate underway — late 2/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fell year-on-year; QoQ holding 10/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 13% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 5.9×P/B — ₹47 of book value per share
Price over the last year ×1.17earnings ×0.75, price-tag ×1.57

Multiple moved without the earnings — the return sits in sentiment.

How this is calculated

Band capped: earnings are not growing over the measured window.

Growth rate used: -25.2% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 40%. Price move is a proxy (distance from the 40-week EMA) until ret1y is stored.

How it compares with its rivals Healthcare · 6 of 30 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Park Medi World ₹282 43.9× ₹12,176 Cr 19.5% +42.3% +19.3%
Apollo Hospitals ₹8,827 60.3× ₹1.27 L Cr 17.4% +34.2% +20.6%
Max Healthcare ₹1,053 68.4× ₹1.02 L Cr 14.7% +4.9% +16.7%
Manipal Health ₹738 109.6× ₹97,055 Cr 12.1% −7.9% +38.1%
Fortis Health. ₹895 63.4× ₹67,588 Cr 13.4% +3.4% +17.5%
Aster DM Quality ₹764 184.5× ₹66,574 Cr 11.6% −46.1% +21.6%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 18 months earlier operating margin 24% → 26% over 18 months
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 96% last year, 109% over three · free cash flow ₹209 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹364 cr — 0.18× its own equity (was 0.65×)
Is it being collected? customers are paying faster 129 days to collect, down 32 in a year · cash cycle −2 days
Who has been buying? promoter stake unchanged on record promoters 82.9% · FIIs 0.8% · DIIs 8.9%
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 19.5% · ROE 16.8%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.

Against it

  • Though the company is reporting repeated profits, it is not paying out dividend

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.