← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1↕ from Watch

Raghav Productivity EnhancersNSE:RPEL

Capital Goods · ₹7,111 Cr market cap · covered for 2 quarters since Q4 2026

Current view Q1 2027

World's largest maker of the silica lining inside scrap-steel furnaces, a consumable every furnace rebuys. Volume, margin and exports are all rising together, operating margin 23% to 29.6%, plants ~94% full, 29% more capacity due October 2026. Management delivers what it says, but the value-add products promised since FY24 still earn nothing.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

How this view changed

Q1 2027 ●Positive Tier 1 ↕ from Watch this quarter
Q4 2026 ◐Watch Tier 1 ✨ AI report ↗
World's top furnace-lining maker, debt-free with fat ~29% margins and steady market-share gains. New 29% capacity boost goes live around Oct 2026 for very little money. Worth watching for that.
SALES
▲+39.3%YoY
+9.4%QoQ
OP PROFIT
▲+47.5%YoY
+9.9%QoQ
EPS
▲+49.3%YoY
+7.1%QoQ
PAT
▲+49.6%YoY
+7.4%QoQ

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +50.0%+22.5%+23.3%+31.6%
Operating profit▲ +62.5%+23.8%+28.8%+38.7%
EPS▲ +67.7%+29.1%+29.6%+41.6%
PAT▲ +66.7%+33.3%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +50.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average56/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 30% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹1,704 → ₹3,408 needs the P/E at 115× — it is 125× today, and has ranged 27× to 248× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.1 +9% — profit growing 30% a year, and buyers paying 62× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

27×5-year low 63×usual level 115×to double 125×today 172×to triple 248×5-year high

Tripling needs 172× — it has traded there — high was 248×.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ inflection⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?P/E 125× is 2.01× its own 5-year average of 62× — far above it; forward PEG 3.25 — expensive for its growth 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×2.03 a year (×2.03 over the year) — already re-rated 0/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?mostly sales-backed; QoQ holding 26/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 26% on its own book — high 10/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 32.0×P/B — ₹53 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 96×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×2.63earnings ×1.30, price-tag ×2.03
At what price this changes
Average from ₹1,619 to ₹6,804 · now ₹1,704
below ₹1,602 → Weak

At ₹849 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 62× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹7,111 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 29.6% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Capital Goods · 6 of 12 listed

It earns 30% on its capital, second of 6, and it is the most expensive of those shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Raghav Product. ₹1,669 122.2× ₹7,663 Cr 30.3% +67.5% +48.7%
Graphite India ₹829 73.9× ₹16,197 Cr 4.6% +28.4% +26.6%
Vesuvius India ₹404 32.0× ₹8,200 Cr 21.3% −7.1% +2.3%
RHI Magnesita ₹368 40.6× ₹7,597 Cr 6.5% +83.2% +5.6%
HEG ₹238 13.0× ₹4,600 Cr 8.3% +22.6% +11.1%
Monolithisch Ind ₹1,270 95.9× ₹2,760 Cr 34.8% +134.7% +63.9%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 3 years earlier operating margin 28% → 30% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it, with some tied up 70% last year, 77% over three · free cash flow ₹23 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹5 cr — 0.02× its own equity (was 0.04×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 83 days to collect, down 11 in a year · cash cycle 255 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 62.9%, 62.9% → 62.9% over 2.8 years · FIIs 0.8% (+0.7) · DIIs 0.0% · shareholders 10,730 → 14,899
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 30.3% · ROE 24.3%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 42.2% CAGR over last 5 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 30.8 times its book value

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.