← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Sakar Healthcare LtdNSE:SAKAR

Healthcare · ₹2,460 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Cancer-drug factory is the engine: sales jumped 42%, profit 67%, and the plant is paid-for and under 30% full. Watch: the big Europe export dream keeps slipping.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +42.0%+1.4%+23.6%+21.4%
Operating profit▲ +62.5%+36.8%+23.2%+24.2%
EPS▲ +88.9%+7.4%+26.9%+14.9%
PAT▲ +83.3%+10.0%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +42.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average58/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 27% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has never reached

₹1,090 → ₹2,179 needs the P/E at 78× — it is 80× today, and has ranged 17× to 66× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.0 +5% — profit growing 27% a year, and buyers paying 41× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

17×5-year low 40×usual level 66×5-year high 78×to double 80×today 117×to triple

Tripling needs 117× — never traded above 66× in 5 years.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?P/E 80× is 1.95× its own 5-year average of 41× — far above it; forward PEG 2.33 — expensive for its growth 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.16 a year (×1.57 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 9% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 7.5×P/B — ₹146 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 63×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.47earnings ×1.27, price-tag ×1.16
At what price this changes
Average from ₹771 to ₹4,357 · now ₹1,090
below ₹760 → Weak

At ₹558 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 41× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹2,460 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 26.9% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Healthcare · 6 of 159 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Sakar Healthcare ₹1,171 72.2× ₹2,605 Cr 12.4% +120.1% +38.4%
Sun Pharma.Inds. ₹1,851 35.1× ₹4.44 L Cr 20.5% +6.0% +10.5%
Divi's Lab. ₹9,379 83.5× ₹2.49 L Cr 22.0% +65.5% +27.8%
Torrent Pharma. ₹4,858 82.8× ₹1.85 L Cr 15.2% +5.8% +54.9%
Zydus Lifesci. ₹1,154 23.6× ₹1.15 L Cr 21.1% −35.1% +22.0%
Cipla ₹1,374 31.0× ₹1.11 L Cr 15.5% −39.2% +2.3%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? wider, but it has moved around a lot operating margin 23% → 29% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it, with some tied up 77% last year, 74% over three · free cash flow ₹21 cr, positive in 2 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹71 cr — 0.22× its own equity (was 0.30×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 73 days to collect, up 10 in a year · cash cycle 127 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 52.5% (−0.3 in a year), 54.1% → 52.5% over 2.8 years · FIIs 12.1% (−1.3) · DIIs 11.4% (+0.1) · shareholders 7,299 → 14,734
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 12.4% · ROE 10.0%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 23.1% CAGR over last 5 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 8.12 times its book value
  • Though the company is reporting repeated profits, it is not paying out dividend
  • Company has a low return on equity of 7.50% over last 3 years.
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last 3 years: -8.20%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.