← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Vidhi Specialty Food Ingredients LtdNSE:VIDHIING

Pigments · ₹1,695 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

Makes synthetic food colours; 95% exported, six US-FDA approved. Roha runs full but Dahej only 65–70%, and two pilot plants for pharma coatings and cosmetic pigments commission mid-FY28 on ₹75–85 cr of self-funded capex; manufacturing earns 24.7%. But revenue outgrew profit because the low-margin trading business they spent three years exiting has restarted.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +65.9%+18.7%−2.0%+7.4%
Operating profit▲ +23.8%+23.8%+12.0%+7.8%
EPS▲ +35.0%+30.4%+9.1%+6.0%
PAT▲ +30.8%+30.8%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is PAT at +30.8%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average60/100

Growing, but too slowly to re-price. Profit per share grew 9% a year. A big re-pricing usually needs more than 15% a year, so the score is capped no matter how cheap it looks.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has reached before

₹354 → ₹708 needs the P/E at 51× — it is 33× today, and has ranged 27× to 74× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.6 +61% — profit growing 9% a year, and buyers paying 41× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

27×5-year low 33×today 41×usual level 51×to double 74×5-year high 77×to triple

Tripling needs 77× — never traded above 74× in 5 years.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet⚠ low growth
Is it cheap right now?P/E 33× is 0.81× its own 5-year average of 41× — below it; forward PEG 3.35 — expensive for its growth 10/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.87 a year (×0.67 over 3 years) — slight de-rate 10/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?sales not growing; QoQ holding 15/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 16% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 5.4×P/B — ₹66 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 30×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×0.95earnings ×1.09, price-tag ×0.87

Unpaid, but the growth quality is thin. Verify before acting.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹1,695 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Band capped: growth of 9.1% is below the 15% bar a re-rate needs.

Growth rate used: 9.1% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 35%.

How it compares with its rivals Pigments · 6 of 94 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Vidhi Specialty ₹347 32.5× ₹1,734 Cr 18.8% +34.8% +66.4%
Pidilite Inds. ₹1,596 61.4× ₹1.62 L Cr 31.0% +28.2% +21.3%
Gujarat Fluoroch ₹4,586 81.6× ₹50,373 Cr 9.6% +21.4% +24.0%
Navin Fluo.Intl. ₹8,410 54.3× ₹43,156 Cr 21.0% +107.7% +44.1%
Deepak Nitrite ₹1,605 27.6× ₹21,894 Cr 11.4% +207.5% +36.4%
Aether Industri. ₹1,641 90.8× ₹21,774 Cr 11.9% +28.0% +27.3%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 3 years earlier operating margin 16% → 18% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it, with some tied up 75% last year, 77% over three · free cash flow ₹26 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹58 cr — 0.18× its own equity (was 0.22×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 137 days to collect, up 14 in a year · cash cycle 238 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 64.3%, 64.3% → 64.3% over 2.8 years · FIIs 0.1% (−0.1) · DIIs 0.0% · shareholders 18,432 → 14,557
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 18.8% · ROE 15.6%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 38.6%

Against it

  • The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 7.36% over past five years.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.