← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Vijaya Diagnostic Centre LtdNSE:VIJAYA

Healthcare · ₹14,820 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

South-India diagnostics chain with an excellent, honest management team that consistently beats its own targets, high margins, and volume-led growth. The only worry is the pricey stock versus its sales and assets.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +26.6%+6.8%+21.0%+16.6%
Operating profit▲ +39.1%+11.6%+22.2%+15.0%
EPS▲ +37.1%+10.9%+26.6%−2.0%
PAT▲ +37.1%+11.6%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +26.6%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average62/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 27% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has reached before

₹1,501 → ₹3,003 needs the P/E at 88× — it is 89× today, and has ranged 22× to 101× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.4 +40% — profit growing 27% a year, and buyers paying 62× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

22×5-year low 62×usual level 88×to double 89×today 101×5-year high 132×to triple

Tripling needs 132× — never traded above 101× in 5 years.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them
Is it cheap right now?P/E 89× is 1.44× its own 5-year average of 62× — above it; forward PEG 2.65 — expensive for its growth 2/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.14 a year (×1.49 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?mostly sales-backed; QoQ holding 26/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 18% on its own book — good 8/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 16.1×P/B — ₹93 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 70×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.45earnings ×1.27, price-tag ×1.14
At what price this changes
Average from ₹1,276 to ₹6,001 · now ₹1,501
below ₹1,261 → Weak

At ₹1,040 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 62× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mid-cap at ₹14,820 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 26.6% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 37%.

How it compares with its rivals Healthcare · 6 of 17 listed

It earns 21% on its capital, third of 6, and it is the second most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Vijaya Diagnost. ₹1,548 85.0× ₹15,944 Cr 20.5% +37.6% +22.8%
Dr Lal Pathlabs ₹1,922 57.4× ₹32,261 Cr 28.0% +28.0% +19.1%
Metropolis Healt ₹594 59.2× ₹12,319 Cr 17.8% +25.8% +16.6%
Thyrocare Tech. ₹557 49.0× ₹8,862 Cr 35.4% +34.1% +24.3%
Nephrocare Health Services ₹742 87.7× ₹7,461 Cr 15.3% +34.9% +23.7%
Suraksha Diagno. ₹336 48.9× ₹1,750 Cr 17.3% +38.4% +20.8%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 3 years earlier operating margin 40% → 43% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it arrived as cash 96% last year, 97% over three · free cash flow ₹91 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹423 cr — 0.44× its own equity (was 0.40×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 9 days to collect, up 1 in a year · cash cycle −117 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 52.5% (−0.1 in a year), 54.9% → 52.5% over 2.8 years · FIIs 11.7% (−7.9) · DIIs 31.6% (+7.5) · shareholders 72,795 → 67,251
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 20.5% · ROE 18.3%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 16.6 times its book value

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.