← All companiesBy market cap
◆ConcernTier 1

Vinyas Innovative Technologies LtdNSE:VINYAS

Contract Manufacturing · ₹1,778 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Makes electronics for defence and aerospace gear. A Rs 1,309 crore order book and 30% sales growth give a real runway, but cash stays stuck in working capital and the stock is richly priced.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +22.4%+42.7%+29.9%+20.2%
Operating profit▲ +64.8%+85.3%+37.2%+37.1%
EPS▲ +73.5%+130.6%——
PAT▲ +73.5%+130.5%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +22.4%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Good72/100

⚠ Your own view on this company is Concern. Read the note above first — this score reads the figures, and it has not read the concall.

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 60% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹1,527 → ₹3,055 needs the P/E at 30× — it is 62× today, and has ranged 46× to 100× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×4.3 +326% — profit growing 60% a year, and buyers paying 65× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

30×to double 46×5-year low 46×to triple 62×today 65×usual level 100×5-year high

Tripling needs 46× — inside its 5-year range, under the 65× median.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet⚠ short history⚠ EPS not sales-backed
Is it cheap right now?P/E 62× is 0.96× its own 5-year average of 65× — below it; forward PEG 0.65 — cheap for its growth 15/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.76 a year (×0.76 over the year) — mostly unpaid 13/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?margin-assisted; QoQ holding 19/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 13% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 8.2×P/B — ₹187 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 39×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.21earnings ×1.60, price-tag ×0.76
At what price this changes
Good from ₹1,287 to ₹1,872 · now ₹1,527
above ₹1,887 → Average  ·  below ₹1,272 → Average

At ₹1,588 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 65× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth still unpaid, one leg weaker. Worth the concall read.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹1,778 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 60.0% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from the latest quarter's YoY EPS growth, capped at 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Contract Manufacturing · 6 of 130 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Vinyas Innovativ ₹1,432 58.4× ₹1,802 Cr — — —
Indo-MIM ₹1,051 80.5× ₹51,975 Cr 25.0% +31.6% +9.4%
Aditya Infotech ₹3,468 85.9× ₹41,021 Cr 28.6% +332.5% +89.5%
Syrma SGS Tech. ₹1,743 90.6× ₹33,616 Cr 16.8% +101.2% +68.3%
Honeywell Auto ₹35,725 56.5× ₹31,581 Cr 16.9% +20.9% +1.8%
Jyoti CNC Auto. ₹1,055 74.5× ₹23,982 Cr 21.3% −20.0% +24.0%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Mar 2026

Did the profit turn into cash? very little of it arrived as cash -34% last year, -34% over three · free cash flow −₹67 cr, positive in 0 of 1 years
Is the growth borrowed? borrowed about as much as it owns ₹130 cr — 0.55× its own equity
Is it being collected? customers pay on the usual terms 161 days to collect · cash cycle 232 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 29.4%, 29.4% → 29.4% over 2 years · FIIs 0.5% (+0.5) · DIIs 6.5% (+3.8) · shareholders 854 → 1,673
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROE 13.1%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 7.62 times its book value
  • Promoter holding is low: 29.4%
  • Company has high debtors of 161 days.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.