← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

ADF Foods LtdNSE:ADFFOODS

FMCG · ₹2,986 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Sells Indian frozen food abroad; its US brand is now in 3,000 stores and running ahead of plan, plus a new factory just opened. Watch out: Middle East war could slow next year's growth.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +23.9%+3.1%+14.9%+13.0%
Operating profit▲ +36.0%−8.1%+16.1%+14.2%
EPS▲ +57.3%+15.7%+17.1%+10.3%
PAT▲ +62.5%+18.2%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +23.9%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Good73/100

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 17% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has reached before

₹267 → ₹533 needs the P/E at 41× — it is 33× today, and has ranged 19× to 47× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.6 +64% — profit growing 17% a year, and buyers paying 33× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

19×5-year low 33×today 33×usual level 41×to double 47×5-year high 61×to triple

Tripling needs 61× — never traded above 47× in 5 years.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?P/E 33× is 0.98× its own 5-year average of 33× — below it; forward PEG 1.63 — dear for its growth 15/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.94 a year (×0.82 over 3 years) — slight de-rate 10/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 16% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 5.1×P/B — ₹52 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 28×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.10earnings ×1.17, price-tag ×0.94
At what price this changes
Good from ₹258 to ₹270 · now ₹267
above ₹273 → Strong  ·  below ₹255 → Average

At ₹273 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 33× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth still unpaid, one leg weaker. Worth the concall read.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹2,986 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 17.1% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 57%.

How it compares with its rivals FMCG · 6 of 27 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
ADF Foods ₹262 29.8× ₹2,880 Cr 21.8% +13.4% +25.9%
Nestle India ₹1,351 69.4× ₹2.61 L Cr 84.1% +48.6% +25.2%
Britannia Inds. ₹5,004 46.3× ₹1.21 L Cr 56.0% +13.6% +8.2%
Zydus Wellness ₹519 74.4× ₹16,498 Cr 4.9% −7.0% +66.9%
Bikaji Foods ₹552 49.9× ₹13,837 Cr 22.0% +2.2% +8.7%
The Bombay Burmah ₹1,472 8.3× ₹10,271 Cr 33.0% +17.5% +8.0%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? slightly narrower than 3 years earlier operating margin 20% → 18% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it, with some tied up 70% last year, 74% over three · free cash flow −₹25 cr, positive in 2 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹55 cr — 0.10× its own equity (was 0.12×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 77 days to collect, up 4 in a year · cash cycle 162 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 36.1%, 36.3% → 36.1% over 2.8 years · FIIs 11.6% (+0.3) · DIIs 21.3% (−1.4) · shareholders 31,526 → 39,264
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 21.8% · ROE 17.7%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 37.2%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.