← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

CG Power & Industrial SolutionsNSE:CGPOWER

Power · ₹1.34 L Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Riding a power-grid boom, winning big transformer orders including for US data centres, with capacity being multiplied several-fold and a new semiconductor bet. Cleaned-up, debt-free business; current management consistently delivers, though the turnaround is young.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +25.0%+8.4%+21.2%+33.2%
Operating profit▲ +34.3%+17.4%+12.7%+0.9%
EPS▲ +30.3%+28.2%+6.7%−4.6%
PAT▲ +32.5%+27.8%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +25.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average56/100

Growing, but too slowly to re-price. Profit per share grew 7% a year. A big re-pricing usually needs more than 15% a year, so the score is capped no matter how cheap it looks.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has never reached

₹865 → ₹1,730 needs the P/E at 185× — it is 112× today, and has ranged 17× to 141× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×0.9 -12% — profit growing 7% a year, and buyers paying 81× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

17×5-year low 82×usual level 112×today 141×5-year high 185×to double 277×to triple

Tripling needs 277× — never traded above 141× in 5 years.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ low growth⚠ size is the headwind⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?P/E 112× is 1.38× its own 5-year average of 81× — above it; forward PEG 15.62 — expensive for its growth 2/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.17 a year (×1.62 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 15% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 17.1×P/B — ₹51 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 105×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.25earnings ×1.07, price-tag ×1.17

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mega-cap at ₹1,34,181 cr — size is the headwind here: a triple means the market finding ₹2,68,362 cr of new value.

Band capped: growth of 6.7% is below the 15% bar a re-rate needs.

Growth rate used: 6.7% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 30%.

How it compares with its rivals Power · 6 of 46 listed

It earns 27% on its capital, fourth of 6, and it is the second most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
CG Power & Ind ₹907 112.4× ₹1.43 L Cr 26.7% +16.3% +14.0%
A B B ₹7,188 98.8× ₹1.52 L Cr 29.9% +8.0% +21.0%
B H E L ₹432 61.9× ₹1.50 L Cr 9.1% +182.7% +40.3%
Hitachi Energy ₹31,820 119.1× ₹1.42 L Cr 29.4% +123.5% +68.6%
Siemens ₹3,801 90.0× ₹1.35 L Cr 21.4% −18.6% +14.8%
Siemens Ener.Ind ₹3,146 73.3× ₹1.12 L Cr 67.8% +67.8% +39.3%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? slightly narrower than 3 years earlier operating margin 14% → 12% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it arrived as cash 74% last year, 83% over three · free cash flow −₹72 cr, positive in 4 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹118 cr — 0.01× its own equity (was 0.01×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 86 days to collect, up 12 in a year · cash cycle 48 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have been selling promoters 56.4% (−1.7 in a year), 58.1% → 56.4% over 2.8 years · FIIs 12.0% (−0.7) · DIIs 18.2% (+4.0) · shareholders 1,84,064 → 5,33,530
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 26.7% · ROE 20.5%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 30.2%
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 17.1%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 17.8 times its book value
  • Working capital days have increased from 31.3 days to 69.8 days

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.