← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1↕ from Concern

Bharat Heavy ElectricalsNSE:BHEL

Power · ₹1.42 L Cr market cap · covered for 2 quarters since Q4 2026

Current view Q1 2027

India's state-owned builder of power-station boilers and turbines. The thermal super-cycle is real: a record order book covering about seven years of work, and a power segment that swung ₹1,073 cr into profit — its first June-quarter profit since FY19. But one Meja order was 79% of the quarter's inflow.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

How this view changed

Q1 2027 ●Positive Tier 1 ↕ from Concern this quarter
Q4 2026 ◆Concern Tier 1 ✨ AI report ↗
Makes boilers and turbines for coal power plants, which India is ordering again. The record order book is finally turning into real sales and tripled profit - but at 87 times earnings on thin ~8% returns, it's priced for perfection.
SALES
▲+36.9%YoY
+45.3%QoQ
OP PROFIT
▲+110.8%YoY
+221.5%QoQ
EPS
▲+155.9%YoY
+231.3%QoQ
PAT
▲+155.8%YoY
+230.6%QoQ

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +40.3%−37.5%+13.1%+14.3%
Operating profit▲ +193.8%−71.3%+29.4%+26.8%
EPS▲ +182.4%−70.9%+34.8%+20.8%
PAT▲ +182.7%−70.8%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +40.3%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Weak47/100

⚠ Your own view here is Positive, and the figures are not. The note above is where the reason lives; the score only sees the numbers.

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 35% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹412 → ₹824 needs the P/E at 48× — it is 59× today, and has ranged 27× to 435× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.4 +44% — profit growing 35% a year, and buyers paying 35× for it

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

27×5-year low 48×to double 59×today 72×to triple 138×usual level 435×5-year high

Tripling needs 72× — inside its 5-year range, under the 138× median.

Target capped at 35× — its 130× five-year average came from near-zero earnings.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ EPS not sales-backed⚠ size is the headwind
Is it cheap right now?P/E 59× is 0.45× its own 5-year average of 130× — deeply below it; forward PEG 1.26 — dear for its growth 15/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.09 a year (×1.29 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?margin-assisted; QoQ collapsed — a spike, not a trend 11/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 9% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 5.5×P/B — ₹75 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 44×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.47earnings ×1.35, price-tag ×1.09
At what price this changes
Weak from ₹164 to ₹416 · now ₹412
above ₹420 → Average  ·  below ₹160 → Average

At ₹243 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 35× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mega-cap at ₹1,42,368 cr — size is the headwind here: a triple means the market finding ₹2,84,736 cr of new value.

Why the target is capped at 35×. This company averaged 130× over five years, but a multiple that high comes from near-zero earnings rather than from what buyers chose to pay — projecting a return to it would price in the collapse, not the recovery. 35× is what a 35% grower supports.

Growth rate used: 34.8% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Power · 6 of 46 listed

It earns 9% on its capital, sixth of 6, and it is the cheapest of those shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
B H E L ₹432 61.9× ₹1.50 L Cr 9.1% +182.7% +40.3%
A B B ₹7,188 98.8× ₹1.52 L Cr 29.9% +8.0% +21.0%
CG Power & Ind ₹907 112.4× ₹1.43 L Cr 26.7% +16.3% +14.0%
Hitachi Energy ₹31,820 119.1× ₹1.42 L Cr 29.4% +123.5% +68.6%
Siemens ₹3,801 90.0× ₹1.35 L Cr 21.4% −18.6% +14.8%
Siemens Ener.Ind ₹3,146 73.3× ₹1.12 L Cr 67.8% +67.8% +39.3%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? wider, but it has moved around a lot operating margin -4% → 7% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? very little of it arrived as cash 227% last year, -59% over three · free cash flow ₹5,261 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹8,187 cr — 0.31× its own equity (was 0.36×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 73 days to collect, down 3 in a year · cash cycle 151 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have been selling promoters 58.2% (−5.0 in a year), 63.2% → 58.2% over 2.8 years · FIIs 9.5% (+3.2) · DIIs 22.4% (+3.9) · shareholders 12,27,658 → 16,28,020
What does it earn on its capital? earns little on its capital ROCE 9.1% · ROE 6.2%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 20.9% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 31.3%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 5.76 times its book value
  • Company has a low return on equity of 3.18% over last 3 years.
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last 3 years: -5.00%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.