← All companiesBy market cap
◐WatchTier 1

Solar IndustriesNSE:SOLARINDS

Defence · ₹1.71 L Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

World's largest explosives maker with a booming defence arm (Pinaka rockets, drones) - profit up 35% and a two-year order book. Real, proven growth, but the stock is very pricey.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +40.9%+19.8%+12.4%+31.4%
Operating profit▲ +53.8%+16.7%+27.7%+38.7%
EPS▲ +70.0%+22.7%+30.4%+43.4%
PAT▲ +60.7%+19.1%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +40.9%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average54/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 30% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹19,150 → ₹38,300 needs the P/E at 93× — it is 103× today, and has ranged 69× to 197× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×0.7 -35% — profit growing 30% a year, and buyers paying 30× for it

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

69×5-year low 93×to double 103×today 118×usual level 140×to triple 197×5-year high

Tripling needs 140× — it has traded there — high was 197×.

Target capped at 30× — its 117× five-year average came from near-zero earnings.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ size is the headwind⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?P/E 103× is 0.88× its own 5-year average of 117× — below it; forward PEG 2.61 — expensive for its growth 8/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.22 a year (×1.80 over 3 years) — re-rate underway — late 2/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?margin-assisted; QoQ holding 21/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 27% on its own book — high 10/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 27.6×P/B — ₹694 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 79×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.58earnings ×1.30, price-tag ×1.22
At what price this changes
Average from ₹17,422 to ₹76,558 · now ₹19,150
below ₹17,230 → Weak

At ₹5,628 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 30× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mega-cap at ₹1,71,207 cr — size is the headwind here: a triple means the market finding ₹3,42,414 cr of new value.

Why the target is capped at 30×. This company averaged 117× over five years, but a multiple that high comes from near-zero earnings rather than from what buyers chose to pay — projecting a return to it would price in the collapse, not the recovery. 30× is what a 30% grower supports.

Growth rate used: 30.4% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Defence · 5 shown

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Solar Industries ₹18,980 86.2× ₹1.72 L Cr 38.1% +92.7% +70.3%
Prem. Explosives ₹671 104.9× ₹3,607 Cr 22.6% −83.4% −27.9%
GOCL Corpn. ₹451 8.3× ₹2,235 Cr 7.0% −5.9% +26.6%
Keltech Energies ₹12,273 46.9× ₹1,227 Cr 20.4% −1.6% +27.8%
Beezaasan Exp. ₹607 69.4× ₹920 Cr 12.2% −0.2% −2.1%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? wider, but it has moved around a lot operating margin 19% → 28% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 47% last year, 101% over three · free cash flow −₹1,072 cr, positive in 4 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹1,524 cr — 0.24× its own equity (was 0.22×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 69 days to collect, up 9 in a year · cash cycle 152 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 73.2%, 73.2% → 73.2% over 2.8 years · FIIs 6.4% (−0.4) · DIIs 13.4% (−0.2) · shareholders 50,103 → 1,16,877
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 38.1% · ROE 32.6%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 44.6% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 32.2%
  • Company's median sales growth is 22.8% of last 10 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 27.2 times its book value
  • Working capital days have increased from 49.9 days to 74.4 days

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.