← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Deepak NitriteNSE:DEEPAKNTR

Bulk Chemicals · ₹21,737 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

Makes phenol, acetone and specialty chemicals. It performed best while the foreign competitor's import duty was nil for the whole quarter; the duty was reapplied at quarter-end, so Q2 should be more profitable. Phenol output lifted by half for under ₹200 cr, promoter buying near ₹1,588. But 86% of segment profit is one spread, and polycarbonate slipped to FY29 at ₹11,500 cr from ₹5,000 cr.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +36.4%+21.6%−0.4%+12.6%
Operating profit▲ +184.2%+43.6%−8.3%−4.1%
EPS▲ +207.4%+57.0%−13.6%−6.6%
PAT▲ +208.0%+56.8%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +36.4%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Poor21/100

⚠ Your own view here is Positive, and the figures are not. The note above is where the reason lives; the score only sees the numbers.

Earnings are shrinking, not growing. Profit per share fell 14% a year over the window measured. Nothing compounds from here until that turns, whatever the price does.

No forward view — earnings are not compounding, so there is nothing to project.

The Hope Tradebuyers paying more for earnings that are not growing⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?earnings are not growing — a low multiple here is not a discount 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.05 a year (×1.14 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fell year-on-year; QoQ holding 10/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 13% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?below all three EMAs — falling knife 0/20
Price vs its book value 3.6×P/B — ₹428 of book value per share
Price over the last year ×0.90earnings ×0.86, price-tag ×1.05

Multiple moved without the earnings — the return sits in sentiment.

How this is calculated

Band capped: earnings are not growing over the measured window.

Growth rate used: -13.6% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Bulk Chemicals · 6 of 94 listed

It earns 11% on its capital, fifth of 6, and it is the fifth most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Deepak Nitrite ₹1,605 27.6× ₹21,892 Cr 11.4% +207.5% +36.4%
Pidilite Inds. ₹1,595 61.3× ₹1.62 L Cr 31.0% +28.2% +21.3%
Gujarat Fluoroch ₹4,577 81.4× ₹50,278 Cr 9.6% +21.4% +24.0%
Navin Fluo.Intl. ₹8,429 54.5× ₹43,252 Cr 21.0% +107.7% +44.1%
Aether Industri. ₹1,639 90.7× ₹21,754 Cr 11.9% +28.0% +27.3%
Atul ₹6,142 22.7× ₹18,082 Cr 14.9% +92.0% +25.0%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? wider, but it has moved around a lot operating margin 12% → 21% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it arrived as cash 74% last year, 84% over three · free cash flow −₹658 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹1,638 cr — 0.28× its own equity (was 0.24×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 70 days to collect, up 14 in a year · cash cycle 92 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 49.3% (+0.1 in a year), 49.1% → 49.3% over 2.8 years · FIIs 6.2% (−0.4) · DIIs 23.8% (+1.1) · shareholders 5,72,562 → 3,82,905
What does it earn on its capital? earns little on its capital ROCE 11.4% · ROE 9.8%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

Against it

  • Company has a low return on equity of 12.8% over last 3 years.
  • Company might be capitalizing the interest cost

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.