← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Dynamic Cables LtdNSE:DYCL

Wires & Cables · ₹2,098 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

Jaipur maker of the wires that carry electricity across India's grid, and the customer has flipped from government discoms to 71% private. Entered the US market after a 15-18 month delay - 2% of sales today, a long runway later - and the new plant commissions this September, on an ₹811 cr order book, 26% return on capital and low debt at 21x. But volumes barely grew and the order book is up only 10%, so the headline growth is aluminium prices.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +33.2%−1.7%+21.4%+28.4%
Operating profit▲ +40.7%+0.0%+27.6%+32.1%
EPS▲ +37.3%+3.2%+35.2%+50.7%
PAT▲ +38.9%+4.2%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +33.2%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Good73/100

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 35% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹435 → ₹870 needs the P/E at 19× — it is 23× today, and has ranged 7.2× to 52× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×2.4 +144% — profit growing 35% a year, and buyers paying 23× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

7.2×5-year low 19×to double 23×usual level 23×today 28×to triple 52×5-year high

Tripling needs 28× — it has traded there — high was 52×.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet
Is it cheap right now?P/E 23× is 1.01× its own 5-year average of 23× — about level with it; forward PEG 0.49 — very cheap for its growth 16/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.92 a year (×0.78 over 3 years) — slight de-rate 10/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?mostly sales-backed; QoQ holding 26/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 20% on its own book — good 8/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 4.6×P/B — ₹94 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 17×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.24earnings ×1.35, price-tag ×0.92
At what price this changes
Good from ₹431 to ₹439 · now ₹435
above ₹443 → Strong  ·  below ₹427 → Strong

At ₹429 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 23× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth still unpaid, one leg weaker. Worth the concall read.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹2,098 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 35.2% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 37%.

How it compares with its rivals Wires & Cables · 6 of 22 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Dynamic Cables ₹456 24.3× ₹2,212 Cr 26.2% +37.0% +33.2%
Polycab India ₹8,315 43.8× ₹1.25 L Cr 33.2% +32.5% +39.0%
KEI Industries ₹4,569 43.8× ₹43,679 Cr 20.1% +40.0% +23.0%
R R Kabel ₹2,428 44.9× ₹27,457 Cr 28.1% +117.3% +53.9%
Finolex Cables ₹1,401 26.7× ₹21,427 Cr 16.0% +53.1% +44.3%
KSH Internationa ₹1,043 54.0× ₹7,065 Cr 21.5% +86.2% +108.4%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 11% → 11% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? under half — much of the profit is tied up 69% last year, 53% over three · free cash flow ₹4 cr, positive in 4 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹43 cr — 0.09× its own equity (was 0.16×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 88 days to collect, up 4 in a year · cash cycle 93 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 68.2%, 74.4% → 68.2% over 2.8 years · FIIs 0.7% (−0.6) · DIIs 1.0% (−0.6) · shareholders 35,363 → 51,019
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 26.2% · ROE 19.9%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 53.2% CAGR over last 5 years

Against it

  • Promoter holding has decreased over last 3 years: -6.26%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.