Venus Remedies LtdNSE:VENUSREM
Current view Q4 2026
Makes injectable medicines and antibiotics, exports over 70%. FY26 profit doubled to Rs 103 crore as margins jumped and debt hit zero - but roughly Rs 23 crore was a one-off gain.
Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026
- 10 Sep ’26Newspaper publication of shareholder notice on Transfer of physical shares. ↗
- 9 Sep ’26Newspaper publication for shareholders awareness on transfer of physical shares. ↗
- 8 Sep ’26Social media notice on special window for re-lodgement of physical share transfer requests. ↗
- 21 Aug ’2637th AGM resolutions passed, including Rs.10 final dividend and director appointments. ↗
- 21 Aug ’26Shareholders approved MOA/AOA alteration at 20 Aug 2026 AGM. ↗
Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.
AI concall report · Q4 2026
The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.
Growth Q4 2026
| Metric | This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 | vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 | 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded | 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ▲ +32.8% | +43.9% | +11.7% | +7.2% |
| Operating profit | ▲ +117.2% | +65.8% | +31.7% | +10.5% |
| EPS | ▲ +126.2% | +85.7% | +57.0% | +9.0% |
| PAT | ▲ +128.6% | +84.6% | — | — |
Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +32.8%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.
QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.
Multibagger potential
Average53/100
Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 57% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.
₹1,629 → ₹3,258 needs the P/E at 11× — it is 21× today, and has ranged 4.6× to 28× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.
What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range
Tripling needs 16× — it has traded there — high was 28×.
At ₹946 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 12× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.
Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.
How this is calculated
This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹2,026 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.
Growth rate used: 57.0% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.
How it compares with its rivals Healthcare · 6 of 159 listed
These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.
| Company | Price | P/E | Size | ROCE | Profitlast qtr | Saleslast qtr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Remedies | ₹1,569 | 18.1× | ₹2,097 Cr | 21.7% | +139.3% | +30.4% |
| Sun Pharma.Inds. | ₹1,851 | 35.1× | ₹4.44 L Cr | 20.5% | +6.0% | +10.5% |
| Divi's Lab. | ₹9,379 | 83.5× | ₹2.49 L Cr | 22.0% | +65.5% | +27.8% |
| Torrent Pharma. | ₹4,858 | 82.8× | ₹1.85 L Cr | 15.2% | +5.8% | +54.9% |
| Zydus Lifesci. | ₹1,154 | 23.7× | ₹1.15 L Cr | 21.1% | −35.1% | +22.0% |
| Cipla | ₹1,374 | 31.0× | ₹1.11 L Cr | 15.5% | −39.2% | +2.3% |
Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.
Business quality to Jun 2026
| Are the margins widening? | wider, but it has moved around a lot | operating margin 11% → 19% over 3 years |
|---|---|---|
| Did the profit turn into cash? | more than all of it — reserves released cash too | 129% last year, 126% over three · free cash flow ₹118 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years |
| Is the growth borrowed? | essentially debt-free | ₹12 cr — 0.02× its own equity (was 0.00×) |
| Is it being collected? | collection is steady | 49 days to collect, down 15 in a year · cash cycle 64 days |
| Who has been buying? | the promoters have held steady | promoters 41.8%, 41.8% → 41.8% over 2.8 years · FIIs 2.9% (+0.7) · DIIs 0.9% (+0.8) · shareholders 19,267 → 21,905 |
| What does it earn on its capital? | earns a high return on the capital it employs | ROCE 21.7% · ROE 16.8% |
Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.
Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score
In its favour
- Company is almost debt free.
- Company has delivered good profit growth of 21.8% CAGR over last 5 years
Against it
- Stock is trading at 3.15 times its book value
- The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 7.18% over past five years.
- Company has a low return on equity of 10.5% over last 3 years.
Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.