← All companiesBy market cap
◐WatchTier 1

Manorama IndustriesNSE:MANORAMA

Food Products · ₹12,127 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

Makes speciality cocoa-butter-equivalent and shea-based fats for chocolate and cosmetics. Revenue and margins both keep climbing as capacity utilisation fills up, and management has delivered every guidance so far. But the earnings trigger has already played out and the business is running at peak performance - the next leg, a new product line plus capacity expansion, is an FY28 story.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +39.3%+5.8%+57.0%+46.2%
Operating profit▲ +38.0%+5.8%+82.8%+56.0%
EPS▲ +61.1%+37.0%+98.4%+71.7%
PAT▲ +60.8%+36.7%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +39.3%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Strong78/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 60% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹1,865 → ₹3,730 needs the P/E at 21× — it is 42× today. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×6.1 +511% — profit growing 60% a year, and buyers paying 63× for it again
To triple, the P/E must be31× comfortably inside its own history
Pays today · its average42× / 63× its own 5-year average
The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them
Is it cheap right now?P/E 42× is 0.67× its own 5-year average of 63× — well below it; forward PEG 0.44 — very cheap for its growth 18/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.03 a year (×1.09 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?mostly sales-backed; QoQ holding 24/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 38% on its own book — high 10/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 16.1×P/B — ₹116 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 26×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.65earnings ×1.60, price-tag ×1.03
At what price this changes
Strong from ₹1,865 to ₹2,777 · now ₹1,865
above ₹2,796 → Good  ·  below ₹1,846 → Good

At ₹2,783 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 63× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Both engines fired — but you're buying after the re-rate.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. There is no 5-year range on file for this company, so the comparison falls back to its average alone. This is a mid-cap at ₹12,127 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 60.0% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR, capped at 60%. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Food Products · 6 of 28 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Manorama Indust. ₹1,968 47.0× ₹12,419 Cr 35.4% +61.3% +39.5%
EID Parry ₹689 15.1× ₹12,261 Cr 17.0% −42.5% +3.4%
Orkla India ₹579 26.0× ₹7,936 Cr 14.9% +9.7% +10.4%
Krishival Foods ₹412 53.2× ₹1,171 Cr 16.2% +12.4% +79.6%
Shri Ahimsa ₹473 36.8× ₹1,108 Cr 23.0% +24.4% +14.0%
Freshara Agro ₹446 28.3× ₹1,048 Cr — — —

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — widening, and steadily operating margin 17% → 27% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? very little of it arrived as cash 93% last year, -37% over three · free cash flow ₹206 cr, positive in 2 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? borrowed about as much as it owns ₹355 cr — 0.51× its own equity (was 1.04×)
Is it being collected? customers are paying faster 15 days to collect, down 33 in a year · cash cycle 331 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 54.3% (−0.1 in a year), 57.3% → 54.3% over 2.8 years · FIIs 3.2% (−0.2) · DIIs 2.6% (−2.0) · shareholders 6,712 → 33,841
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 35.4% · ROE 40.2%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 74.0% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has a good return on equity (ROE) track record: 3 Years ROE 29.7%
  • Debtor days have improved from 32.2 to 15.1 days.
  • Company's median sales growth is 34.0% of last 10 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 16.9 times its book value

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.