← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

Lloyds Steels Industries LtdNSE:LLOYDSENGG

Capital Goods · ₹12,375 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Engineering firm with a huge confirmed order book riding India's infra boom. Red flag: the flashy '4x growth' was only on paper, and a group merger dilutes owners ~26%. Very expensive stock.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +131.5%+85.6%+49.8%+71.9%
Operating profit▲ +96.3%+47.2%+49.7%+128.8%
EPS▲ +154.6%+16.7%+44.8%+190.0%
PAT▲ +129.4%+34.5%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is PAT at +129.4%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Good69/100

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 45% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹96 → ₹192 needs the P/E at 69× — it is 104× today, and has ranged 51× to 527× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.3 +30% — profit growing 45% a year, and buyers paying 45× for it

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

51×5-year low 69×to double 94×usual level 103×to triple 104×today 527×5-year high

Tripling needs 103× — it has traded there — high was 527×.

Target capped at 45× — its 94× five-year average came from near-zero earnings.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet⚠ absolute stretch
Is it cheap right now?P/E 104× is 1.11× its own 5-year average of 94× — about level with it; forward PEG 1.61 — dear for its growth 7/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.92 a year (×0.77 over 3 years) — slight de-rate 10/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 8% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 8.4×P/B — ₹11 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 72×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.33earnings ×1.45, price-tag ×0.92
At what price this changes
Good from ₹90 to ₹119 · now ₹96
above ₹120 → Average  ·  below ₹89 → Average

At ₹41 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 45× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Growth still unpaid, one leg weaker. Worth the concall read.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a mid-cap at ₹12,375 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Why the target is capped at 45×. This company averaged 94× over five years, but a multiple that high comes from near-zero earnings rather than from what buyers chose to pay — projecting a return to it would price in the collapse, not the recovery. 45× is what a 45% grower supports.

Growth rate used: 44.8% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Capital Goods · 6 of 130 listed

It earns 15% on its capital, fifth of 6, and it is the second most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Lloyds Engineeri ₹82 88.5× ₹12,763 Cr 14.6% +146.8% +104.5%
Indo-MIM ₹1,051 80.5× ₹51,992 Cr 25.0% +31.6% +9.4%
Aditya Infotech ₹3,466 85.8× ₹40,999 Cr 28.6% +332.5% +89.5%
Syrma SGS Tech. ₹1,745 90.7× ₹33,646 Cr 16.8% +101.2% +68.3%
Honeywell Auto ₹35,725 56.5× ₹31,581 Cr 16.9% +20.9% +1.8%
Kaynes Tech ₹3,551 68.8× ₹23,867 Cr 12.7% −24.4% +40.5%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Aug 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 13% → 13% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? very little of it arrived as cash -198% last year, -20% over three · free cash flow −₹380 cr, positive in 1 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹81 cr — 0.05× its own equity (was 0.07×)
Is it being collected? customers are paying faster 46 days to collect, down 52 in a year · cash cycle 153 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have been selling promoters 40.0% (−9.3 in a year), 59.8% → 40.0% over 2.7 years · FIIs 2.0% (−0.1) · DIIs 0.3% (+0.1) · shareholders 3,55,127 → 4,22,937
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 14.6% · ROE 10.6%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company is expected to give good quarter
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 199% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 29.4%
  • Debtor days have improved from 77.5 to 45.8 days.
  • Company's median sales growth is 19.1% of last 10 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 7.14 times its book value
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last quarter: -1.92%
  • Working capital days have increased from 139 days to 223 days

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.