← All companiesBy market cap
✕NegativeTier 1

Mishra Dhatu Nigam LtdNSE:MIDHANI

Steel · ₹7,476 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

India's near-monopoly maker of strategic defence metals, riding a large import-substitution opportunity. But management repeatedly promises high growth and delivers less; profit margins have also halved over the years. Story steady, execution disappoints.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +34.5%+100.4%+11.5%+8.3%
Operating profit▲ +24.7%+110.9%−2.3%+0.8%
EPS▲ +38.7%+181.1%−5.6%−4.6%
PAT▲ +39.3%+178.6%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +34.5%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Poor31/100

Earnings are shrinking, not growing. Profit per share fell 6% a year over the window measured. Nothing compounds from here until that turns, whatever the price does.

No forward view — earnings are not compounding, so there is nothing to project.

The Hope Tradebuyers paying more for earnings that are not growing⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?earnings are not growing — a low multiple here is not a discount 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.07 a year (×1.22 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fell year-on-year; QoQ holding 10/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 9% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 5.1×P/B — ₹82 of book value per share
Price over the last year ×1.01earnings ×0.94, price-tag ×1.07

Multiple moved without the earnings — the return sits in sentiment.

How this is calculated

Band capped: earnings are not growing over the measured window.

Growth rate used: -5.6% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 39%.

How it compares with its rivals Steel · 6 of 33 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Mishra Dhatu Nig ₹421 58.4× ₹7,878 Cr 11.3% +27.0% +40.5%
Hind.Aeronautics ₹4,862 34.8× ₹3.25 L Cr 32.0% +14.9% +14.4%
Bharat Electron ₹398 47.3× ₹2.91 L Cr 36.4% +8.7% +24.9%
Bharat Dynamics ₹1,176 82.8× ₹43,089 Cr 13.9% +547.4% +130.8%
Garden Reach Sh. ₹2,390 34.2× ₹27,377 Cr 42.8% +43.8% +38.5%
Data Pattern ₹4,533 93.9× ₹25,377 Cr 21.9% −13.5% +16.8%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? no — margins have been squeezed operating margin 22% → 15% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 84% last year, 109% over three · free cash flow ₹105 cr, positive in 3 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? lightly borrowed ₹407 cr — 0.27× its own equity (was 0.25×)
Is it being collected? customers are taking longer to pay 167 days to collect, up 28 in a year · cash cycle 1,022 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 74.0%, 74.0% → 74.0% over 2.8 years · FIIs 2.6% (+1.2) · DIIs 7.4% (−1.6) · shareholders 93,631 → 1,54,762
What does it earn on its capital? earns little on its capital ROCE 11.3% · ROE 8.9%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 24.0%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 5.02 times its book value
  • The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 8.25% over past five years.
  • Company has a low return on equity of 8.06% over last 3 years.
  • Company might be capitalizing the interest cost
  • Company has high debtors of 167 days.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.