← All companiesBy market cap
●PositiveTier 1

TTK PrestigeNSE:TTKPRESTIG

Consumer Electronics · ₹7,464 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q1 2027

Current view Q1 2027

India's biggest pressure-cooker and kitchen-appliance brand. 400–450 new products in 18 months are lifting footfall, and management is targeting margin over volume: after five years of flat revenue and falling margin, revenue is finally breaking out with margin rising, so profit now grows faster than sales. ₹500 cr overhaul funded from ₹870 cr free cash, aiming at 13–14% from 11%. But profit is still 37% below FY22.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q1 2027

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q1 2027

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q1 2027

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q1 2026 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q4 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +33.7%+11.7%+2.3%+6.3%
Operating profit▲ +105.0%+22.4%−8.0%−2.6%
EPS▲ +123.2%+61.0%−13.8%−7.2%
PAT▲ +126.9%+63.9%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +33.7%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Poor18/100

⚠ Your own view here is Positive, and the figures are not. The note above is where the reason lives; the score only sees the numbers.

Earnings are shrinking, not growing. Profit per share fell 14% a year over the window measured. Nothing compounds from here until that turns, whatever the price does.

No forward view — earnings are not compounding, so there is nothing to project.

The Hope Tradebuyers paying more for earnings that are not growing⚠ inflection
Is it cheap right now?earnings are not growing — a low multiple here is not a discount 0/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.02 a year (×1.05 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fell year-on-year; QoQ holding 10/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 10% on its own book — thin 2/10
Is the price trend agreeing?below all three EMAs — falling knife 0/20
Price vs its book value 3.5×P/B — ₹145 of book value per share
Price over the last year ×0.88earnings ×0.86, price-tag ×1.02

Multiple moved without the earnings — the return sits in sentiment.

How this is calculated

Band capped: earnings are not growing over the measured window.

Growth rate used: -13.8% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 60%.

How it compares with its rivals Consumer Electronics · 6 of 23 listed

It earns 12% on its capital, fourth of 6, and it is the fifth most expensive of the 6 shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
TTK Prestige ₹532 35.2× ₹7,286 Cr 12.1% +103.9% +33.6%
LG Electronics ₹1,672 62.2× ₹1.13 L Cr 32.3% +27.2% +15.5%
Voltas ₹1,134 80.3× ₹37,534 Cr 9.0% +52.2% +18.7%
Blue Star ₹1,554 60.4× ₹31,959 Cr 21.2% −21.0% +13.3%
Amber Enterp. ₹7,135 122.0× ₹25,164 Cr 10.3% −3.4% +12.7%
Crompton Gr. Con ₹226 32.1× ₹14,533 Cr 19.0% +12.1% +11.2%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 10% → 10% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 96% last year, 101% over three · free cash flow ₹122 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹174 cr — 0.09× its own equity (was 0.10×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 35 days to collect, down 4 in a year · cash cycle 119 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 70.5%, 70.4% → 70.5% over 2.8 years · FIIs 7.8% (+0.4) · DIIs 14.7% · shareholders 1,00,432 → 85,265
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 12.1% · ROE 9.0%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 57.8%

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 3.68 times its book value
  • The company has delivered a poor sales growth of 6.27% over past five years.
  • Company has a low return on equity of 9.11% over last 3 years.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.