← All companiesBy market cap
◐WatchTier 1

Nephrocare Health Services LtdNSE:NEPHROPLUS

Healthcare · ₹7,421 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

India's biggest dialysis chain is exporting its low-cost model to pricier overseas markets, lifting profit 75%. Saudi unit still loses money but is minor; too newly-listed to fully trust management.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +21.5%+2.3%+31.7%+28.4%
Operating profit▲ +0.0%−16.4%+65.2%+42.6%
EPS▼ −97.5%−5.6%+25.7%+17.6%
PAT▲ +20.0%−6.3%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is PAT at +20.0%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average58/100

Cheap, and growing fast. Profit per share grew 26% a year, while the price-tag on its earnings actually got smaller. That gap — real growth nobody has paid up for — is exactly what this score looks for.

Doubling needs a price-tag it has never reached

₹674 → ₹1,348 needs the P/E at 48× — it is 48× today, and has ranged 2.7× to 3.9× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×0.1 -87% — profit growing 26% a year, and buyers paying 3.2× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

2.7×5-year low 3.2×usual level 3.9×5-year high 48×today 48×to double 72×to triple

Tripling needs 72× — never traded above 3.9× in 5 years.

The Treadmillearnings climbing while the price-tag on them has not — no re-rating yet⚠ fading⚠ priced in
Is it cheap right now?P/E 48× is 14.75× its own 5-year average of 3× — far above it; forward PEG 1.48 — dear for its growth 3/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×0.88 a year (×0.88 over the year) — slight de-rate 10/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales 27/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 13% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 6.1×P/B — ₹111 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 38×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.10earnings ×1.26, price-tag ×0.88
At what price this changes
Average from ₹611 to ₹695 · now ₹674
above ₹702 → Good  ·  below ₹604 → Weak

At ₹46 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 3.2× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Unpaid, but the growth quality is thin. Verify before acting.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹7,421 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 25.7% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads -97%. Price move is a proxy (distance from the 40-week EMA) until ret1y is stored.

How it compares with its rivals Healthcare · 6 of 17 listed

It earns 15% on its capital, sixth of 6, and it is the most expensive of those shown.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Nephrocare Health Services ₹742 87.7× ₹7,461 Cr 15.3% +34.9% +23.7%
Dr Lal Pathlabs ₹1,922 57.4× ₹32,261 Cr 28.0% +28.0% +19.1%
Vijaya Diagnost. ₹1,552 85.3× ₹15,983 Cr 20.5% +37.6% +22.8%
Metropolis Healt ₹594 59.2× ₹12,319 Cr 17.8% +25.8% +16.6%
Thyrocare Tech. ₹557 49.0× ₹8,862 Cr 35.4% +34.1% +24.3%
Suraksha Diagno. ₹336 48.9× ₹1,750 Cr 17.3% +38.4% +20.8%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? broadly flat operating margin 22% → 21% over 18 months
Did the profit turn into cash? most of it arrived as cash 116% last year, 93% over three · free cash flow ₹113 cr, positive in 2 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹80 cr — 0.07× its own equity (was 0.45×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 116 days to collect, down 13 in a year · cash cycle 116 days
Who has been buying? promoter stake unchanged on record promoters 63.9% · FIIs 8.8% · DIIs 9.1%
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 15.3% · ROE 8.8%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is almost debt free.
  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 162% CAGR over last 5 years

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 6.66 times its book value
  • Though the company is reporting repeated profits, it is not paying out dividend
  • Company has a low return on equity of 10.2% over last 3 years.
  • Company's cost of borrowing seems high

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.