← All companiesBy market cap
◐WatchTier 1

SJS EnterprisesNSE:SJS

Auto · ₹7,404 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Actually has a clear growth engine the note missed: fancier decorative parts, big new customer Hero, exports up 60%, record margins. Strong - but the stock is priced expensively.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +29.4%+6.6%+30.2%+17.6%
Operating profit▲ +47.1%+5.6%+35.0%+20.2%
EPS▲ +42.0%+8.5%+34.2%+21.0%
PAT▲ +44.1%+8.9%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +29.4%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average64/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 34% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹2,262 → ₹4,523 needs the P/E at 35× — it is 42× today, and has ranged 20× to 58× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.9 +89% — profit growing 34% a year, and buyers paying 33× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

20×5-year low 33×usual level 35×to double 42×today 52×to triple 58×5-year high

Tripling needs 52× — it has traded there — high was 58×.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them
Is it cheap right now?P/E 42× is 1.28× its own 5-year average of 33× — above it; forward PEG 0.92 — fair for its growth 7/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.11 a year (×1.38 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?EPS fully backed by sales; QoQ holding 30/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 20% on its own book — good 8/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above 40W, below the shorter EMAs 13/20
Price vs its book value 8.3×P/B — ₹271 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 31×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.49earnings ×1.34, price-tag ×1.11
At what price this changes
Average from ₹2,124 to ₹2,331 · now ₹2,262
above ₹2,354 → Good  ·  below ₹2,101 → Good

At ₹1,766 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 33× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹7,404 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 34.2% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 42%.

How it compares with its rivals Auto · 6 of 129 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
SJS Enterprises ₹2,363 40.0× ₹7,622 Cr 28.6% +57.5% +24.5%
Samvardh. Mothe. ₹164 38.0× ₹1.74 L Cr 13.4% +81.5% +16.6%
Bosch ₹47,778 59.6× ₹1.41 L Cr 21.5% +5.2% +22.0%
Bharat Forge ₹1,990 94.2× ₹95,135 Cr 12.6% −57.7% +18.7%
Uno Minda ₹1,241 58.6× ₹71,687 Cr 19.6% +1.8% +23.8%
Schaeffler India ₹4,146 50.1× ₹64,802 Cr 27.9% +13.7% +17.5%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — widening, and steadily operating margin 24% → 29% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 110% last year, 104% over three · free cash flow ₹142 cr, positive in 5 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? essentially debt-free ₹23 cr — 0.03× its own equity (was 0.05×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 85 days to collect, up 1 in a year · cash cycle 81 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have been selling promoters 20.1% (−1.4 in a year), 21.8% → 20.1% over 2.8 years · FIIs 14.7% (−2.2) · DIIs 34.0% (+5.7) · shareholders 64,873 → 74,050
What does it earn on its capital? earns a high return on the capital it employs ROCE 28.6% · ROE 22.0%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has reduced debt.
  • Company is almost debt free.

Against it

  • Stock is trading at 8.70 times its book value
  • Promoter holding has decreased over last quarter: -1.00%
  • Promoter holding is low: 20.2%

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.