← All companiesBy market cap
✕NegativeTier 1

Wheels IndiaNSE:WHEELS

Auto · ₹5,174 Cr market cap · covered for 1 quarter since Q4 2026

Current view Q4 2026

Wheel and parts maker recovering nicely, but the promised double-digit profit margin has been '2 years away' for years and is still stuck near 8%. Rising steel and fuel costs are a fresh worry.

Latest exchange filings last 5 · 5 after Q4 2026

Exchange filings, with the company's own one-line summary, read off the same page as the figures. Screener publishes only the most recent few, so this is the last 5 — not everything filed since your note, and a quiet-looking list is not proof of a quiet quarter. A filing is marked new when it is dated after the end of the quarter your note covers. Not scored, and not a judgement — a routine repayment notice and a takeover sit in the same list.

AI concall report · Q4 2026

The full earnings-call read behind this view — what management promised, what they delivered, and the earning trigger.

✨ Read the report ↗

Growth Q4 2026

Metric This year vs lastYoY · vs Q4 2025 vs the quarter beforeQoQ, sequential · vs Q3 2026 3-year yearly average3Y CAGR · compounded 5-year yearly average5Y CAGR · compounded
Sales▲ +22.5%+14.1%+5.6%+17.8%
Operating profit▲ +22.3%+26.0%+21.6%+25.1%
EPS▲ +52.0%+61.1%+40.2%+142.3%
PAT▲ +51.3%+59.5%——

Tinted rows drive the Tier. Tier = the weaker of YoY Sales and YoY PAT growth. Here the weaker is Sales at +22.5%, which is ≥ 20% → Tier 1.

QoQ is sequential, not a trend. For most Indian companies the March quarter is seasonally the largest, so a June-quarter fall against it is a calendar effect. Only the YoY column feeds the Tier.

Multibagger potential Average55/100

Growing fast — and the market has noticed. Profit per share grew 40% a year, and buyers now pay more for each rupee of it than they did a year ago. Some of the re-pricing has already happened.

It could double even as the price-tag on its earnings shrinks

₹2,324 → ₹4,648 needs the P/E at 27× — it is 37× today, and has ranged 13× to 36× over the last 5 years. The rest would come from earnings growing as they have.

If this keeps up for 3 more years ×1.5 +54% — profit growing 40% a year, and buyers paying 21× for it again

What you pay for its profitlog scale · 5-year range

13×5-year low 21×usual level 27×to double 36×5-year high 37×today 40×to triple

Tripling needs 40× — never traded above 36× in 5 years.

The Multibaggerearnings climbing and buyers already paying more for them⚠ EPS not sales-backed
Is it cheap right now?P/E 37× is 1.79× its own 5-year average of 21× — far above it; forward PEG 0.65 — cheap for its growth 7/25
Has the market paid for this growth yet?ΔMultiple ×1.03 a year (×1.11 over 3 years) — multiple flat 6/15
Is the growth real, or flattered?margin/one-off driven; QoQ holding 17/30
What does it earn on its own money?earns 15% on its own book — fair 5/10
Is the price trend agreeing?above all three EMAs — accumulation 20/20
Price vs its book value 5.5×P/B — ₹426 of book value per share
Price vs next year’s profit 26×forward P/E — what an entry pays now
Price over the last year ×1.45earnings ×1.40, price-tag ×1.03
At what price this changes
Average from ₹1,450 to ₹3,612 · now ₹2,324
above ₹3,635 → Weak  ·  below ₹1,427 → Weak

At ₹1,301 the price-tag on its earnings reaches the 21× it is being projected toward — the point where being cheap against that yardstick is used up.

Re-rated already, on growth that doesn't fully back it.

How this is calculated

This is arithmetic, not a forecast — Return = ΔEPS × ΔMultiple. It says what would have to be true, not how likely it is, and "earnings keep growing at this rate for three more years" is the assumption doing the most work. This is a small-cap at ₹5,174 cr, so the odds of a re-rate are not fighting its own size.

Growth rate used: 40.2% — the weakest of EPS / Sales / Op-profit from 3-year EPS CAGR. Latest quarter reads 52%.

How it compares with its rivals Auto · 6 of 129 listed

These are the industry's largest names rather than companies of its own size, so the columns are worth reading straight across — a ranking against them would only be restating the size gap.

Company PriceP/ESizeROCE Profitlast qtr Saleslast qtr
Wheels India ₹2,146 32.1× ₹5,243 Cr 18.8% +28.2% +17.8%
Samvardh. Mothe. ₹164 38.0× ₹1.74 L Cr 13.4% +81.5% +16.6%
Bosch ₹47,778 59.6× ₹1.41 L Cr 21.5% +5.2% +22.0%
Bharat Forge ₹1,990 94.2× ₹95,135 Cr 12.6% −57.7% +18.7%
Uno Minda ₹1,241 58.6× ₹71,687 Cr 19.6% +1.8% +23.8%
Schaeffler India ₹4,140 50.1× ₹64,702 Cr 27.9% +13.7% +17.5%

Screener's own peer group, from the request already made for the industry P/E. It serves the industry's largest names by market cap, not companies of a similar size, so treat this as context rather than a like-for-like table; this company is always shown. On a phone the price, size and sales columns are dropped rather than pushed off the edge. Not part of the score.

Business quality to Jun 2026

Are the margins widening? yes — a little wider than 3 years earlier operating margin 5% → 8% over 3 years
Did the profit turn into cash? more than all of it — reserves released cash too 124% last year, 125% over three · free cash flow ₹203 cr, positive in 4 of 5 years
Is the growth borrowed? borrowed about as much as it owns ₹768 cr — 0.74× its own equity (was 0.80×)
Is it being collected? collection is steady 55 days to collect, down 7 in a year · cash cycle −3 days
Who has been buying? the promoters have held steady promoters 58.3%, 58.3% → 58.3% over 2.8 years · FIIs 2.0% (+1.4) · DIIs 6.4% (−5.3) · shareholders 16,245 → 29,271
What does it earn on its capital? earns a fair return on its capital ROCE 18.8% · ROE 15.8%

Fetched from the filings, not typed — and deliberately not part of the score. These are the questions the score cannot ask: it reads growth, price and trend, so a company can score well while its profit never becomes cash. Weigh these beside the note, not against the number.

Screener's own checklist not mine, not the score

In its favour

  • Company has delivered good profit growth of 143% CAGR over last 5 years
  • Company has been maintaining a healthy dividend payout of 25.6%

Against it

  • Company has a low return on equity of 12.4% over last 3 years.

Generated by screener.in from a fixed checklist — not written by me and not an input to the score. It is here as a second machine opinion to weigh against the note; where it disagrees with the view above, the note is the considered one.